Camden’s Helpless

by Luis Ramirez

Site Description:

My research topic will be based upon the Camden garbage incinerator located in Camden, New Jersey. The timeline I want to focus on is the 1980s to early 1990s, from the moment the incinerator was proposed to the moment it opened for business. Historical actors will include city officials, environmental agencies, environmental groups, and local Camden residents. This research will explore the people who opposed the Camden incinerator project; how they tried to address an environmental issue about the incinerator, only to be ignored by its own local government. I want to find out who were the people that were opposing the incinerator, how they advocated their cause, what kind of obstacles they faced, and why they failed. This research will not only raise awareness about the inequality in low income minority areas, but to prevent the same mistakes in future situations.           

 

Author Biography:

 My name is Luis Ramirez, I’m a History Major at New Jersey Institute of Technology.

Final Report:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut diam quam nulla porttitor massa id. Elementum facilisis leo vel fringilla est ullamcorper eget nulla. Orci porta non pulvinar neque laoreet suspendisse interdum. Purus semper eget duis at tellus at urna. Diam maecenas ultricies mi eget mauris. Diam ut venenatis tellus in metus vulputate eu. Ullamcorper morbi tincidunt ornare massa eget egestas. Quis eleifend quam adipiscing vitae proin. Consectetur adipiscing elit pellentesque habitant. Cras fermentum odio eu feugiat pretium nibh ipsum consequat nisl. Lectus mauris ultrices eros in cursus turpis massa. Luctus accumsan tortor posuere ac. Porttitor eget dolor morbi non arcu. Maecenas pharetra convallis posuere morbi leo urna molestie. Neque convallis a cras semper auctor neque vitae. In iaculis nunc sed augue. Suspendisse interdum consectetur libero id faucibus. Sit amet porttitor eget dolor.

Felis eget nunc lobortis mattis aliquam faucibus. At elementum eu facilisis sed odio. Eu facilisis sed odio morbi quis commodo odio aenean sed. Habitasse platea dictumst quisque sagittis purus sit amet. Et ultrices neque ornare aenean euismod elementum nisi quis eleifend. Velit dignissim sodales ut eu sem integer. Morbi tempus iaculis urna id volutpat lacus laoreet non curabitur. Aliquam eleifend mi in nulla posuere sollicitudin aliquam. Nunc congue nisi vitae suscipit. Convallis tellus id interdum velit laoreet id. Turpis in eu mi bibendum neque egestas. Magna fermentum iaculis eu non diam phasellus vestibulum. In cursus turpis massa tincidunt dui ut ornare lectus sit.

Non pulvinar neque laoreet suspendisse. Eros donec ac odio tempor orci. Nullam non nisi est sit amet facilisis magna etiam tempor. Platea dictumst vestibulum rhoncus est pellentesque elit ullamcorper. Eleifend donec pretium vulputate sapien nec sagittis aliquam. Proin fermentum leo vel orci porta. Eget dolor morbi non arcu risus quis varius quam quisque. Nec ultrices dui sapien eget mi proin sed. Nisl nisi scelerisque eu ultrices vitae auctor eu augue. Pellentesque pulvinar pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et. Pulvinar elementum integer enim neque volutpat ac. Vel orci porta non pulvinar neque. Laoreet sit amet cursus sit amet.

Pharetra massa massa ultricies mi quis hendrerit dolor magna. Mattis nunc sed blandit libero volutpat. Nec ultrices dui sapien eget. Gravida neque convallis a cras semper auctor neque. Aenean et tortor at risus viverra adipiscing at. Quisque non tellus orci ac auctor augue mauris. Ultrices in iaculis nunc sed augue lacus. Quam elementum pulvinar etiam non. Felis bibendum ut tristique et egestas. Sagittis nisl rhoncus mattis rhoncus. Ac ut consequat semper viverra. Volutpat commodo sed egestas egestas fringilla phasellus faucibus scelerisque. Urna condimentum mattis pellentesque id nibh tortor. Erat nam at lectus urna duis convallis convallis. Malesuada fames ac turpis egestas sed tempus urna et pharetra. Pellentesque diam volutpat commodo sed egestas egestas. Interdum velit euismod in pellentesque massa placerat duis ultricies lacus. Est velit egestas dui id. Pellentesque id nibh tortor id aliquet lectus proin nibh. Id nibh tortor id aliquet lectus proin nibh nisl.

Primary Sources:

https://login.proxy.libraries.rutgers.edu/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Fhistorical-newspapers%2Fdecember-18-1984-page-14-46%2Fdocview%2F1919149898%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D13626

This is a newspaper article written by the Courier-Post on December 18, 1984, regarding the protests of the designation of a potential site for a garbage incinerator. I believe that this source will be useful, as it provides a negative view on the incinerator from the environmental activist perspective. It shows how the protesters believe there’s a lack of trust in the government because there’s no communication. 

https://login.proxy.libraries.rutgers.edu/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Fhistorical-newspapers%2Fmay-13-1990-page-246-634%2Fdocview%2F1843215586%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D13626.

This is a newspaper article written by the Philadelphia Inquirer on May 13, 1990. This article gives a good description of how the garbage incinerator would operate in Camden. It provides a unique illustration of the incinerator showing the technical side of things; the process of trash to steam creating electricity. It gives a good insight into the operation inside the facility. In the months leading up to the opening date of the new garbage incinerator, many people in the Camden community had questions and concerns about the new facility- one of them being how the incinerator would function. 

https://www.nj.gov/dep/dshw/recycling/admentme/Camden/060680cert.pdf

This document from the state of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection dated July 17, 1980. The document explains shortages of landfill disposal capacity impacting Camden County. Camden County would use the facilities in Burlington and Gloucester Counties temporarily. This would only be one of the main reasons as to why Camden built its own garbage incinerator, to reduce the amount of waste in landfills. I believe this source can help better explain the origins of the incinerator- what led to its creation. 

https://www.nj.gov/dep/dshw/recycling/admentme/Camden/120591cert.pdf

This is a document from the state of New Jersey Department of Environmental written on December 5, 1991. This is a good source that shows the type of permits and regulations the South Camden Incinerator had to follow for air pollution control. It will help my readers understand the complex situation, the layers to getting things approved. For example, this source talks about designated truck routes to the incinerator, they have to comply with certain streets weight limit standards. But I can also use this source to question how the incinerator violates the DEP’s regulations, and why citizens want stricter regulations for the incinerator.

https://4944195.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/4944195/CSR%20Resources%20Page/Performance%20Sheets/2023/2023%20Camden%20Facility%20Performance%20Sheet.pdf

 This is a recent performance sheet from 2023 by the company that runs the garbage incinerator in Camden. The data indicates every step the company is taking to reduce pollution. It shows what the annual average emissions are in Camden, compared to federal guidelines. I can use it as evidence of a corporation that would argue the opposite of my argument, they insist they are following guidelines to protect the environment. The corporation provides us with stats from their most recent performance of this facility.
Although this data is from 2023, it shows that they are prioritizing environmental compliance. This data gives a different perspective showing that they are eco friendly. They provided stats of landfill diversion, energy recovery, metal recycling showing how much energy was saved in waste.

 

Secondary Sources:

Sicotte, Diane. “Saving Ourselves by Acting Locally: The Historical Progression of Grassroots Environmental Justice Activism in the Philadelphia Area, 1981–2001.” In Nature’s Entrepot: Philadelphia’s Urban Sphere and Its Environmental Thresholds, edited by Brian C. Black and Michael J. Chiarappa, 231–49. University of Pittsburgh Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.11249276.14.

This chapter discusses the Incinerator battles that took place in the late 1970s to the 1980s. I like this book chapter because it focuses on the landfill crisis- many areas were running out of space for trash in the Philadelphia region including Camden; they needed a solution, and that solution was to build incinerators. I also like this chapter from the book because it provides the aspects from the community, not like the idea of an incinerator in the neighborhood. It shows how environmental activists protested the proposed incinerator. This source provides the name of activist groups such as South Camden Action Team (SCAT) and Citizens against Trash to Steam (CATS); it helps me understand who was involved- the people being affected. 

SICOTTE, DIANE. “Intersectionality and Environmental Inequality in the Philadelphia Region.” In From Workshop to Waste Magnet: Environmental Inequality in the Philadelphia Region, 139–56. Rutgers University Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1gn69sc.13.

This book chapter explains how certain races, class and gender are targets for environmental inequality living within the Philadelphia metropolitan area such as Camden. I like this source because it goes hand in hand with my argument. How certain groups of people are taking advantage of, and this source can help push my argument further. For example, what certain factors make a person a target in these situations. 

SICOTTE, DIANE. “The Rise of Industrial Philadelphia.” In From Workshop to Waste Magnet: Environmental Inequality in the Philadelphia Region, 56–83. Rutgers University Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1gn69sc.10.

This book, specifically this chapter, talks about Camden once being a thriving industrial city in the first half of the 20th century along with Philadelphia, both cities big for manufacturing. I like this book chapter because I can use it to compare and contrast the economic differences between the first and second of the 20th century in Camden. How people were living, what type of opportunities they had, and what the neighborhoods were like. 

Gillette, Howard. “Camden Transformed.” In Camden After the Fall: Decline and Renewal in a Post-Industrial City, 39–62. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fhqkq.7

This book chapter does a good job explaining the transition in Camden from a white to a predominantly black city. I like this source because it provides a U.S. census report of jobs and population in Camden from 1940-82. Looking at the data, by the 1970s there were fewer jobs and less people living in the city. Looking at the data, I can assume Camden was going through a time of deindustrialization.I can use this information to show that Camden suffered an economic decline. Using the data, I can elaborate on the economic decline influencing Camden’s desire to desperately save themselves by building an incinerator to create some type of financial stability, a type of income. 

Hurley, Andrew. “From Factory Town to Metropolitan Junkyard: Postindustrial Transitions on the Urban Periphery.” Environmental History 21, no. 1 (2016): 3–29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24691539.

This article does an excellent job showing the history of deindustrialization with places such as Camden. This source provides information on how cities managed to recover from deindustrialization, using waste matter to create economic growth. I can use this source to show how corporations and politicians used garbage related facilities for political gain in certain cities such as Camden allowing poverty to flourish. I think this source is great for me to use because it explains how socioeconomic factors correlate with environmental hazards, this ties up with my argument. I want to raise awareness about the inequality in low income neighborhoods. 

 

 

Image Analysis:

Photo caption here

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut diam quam nulla porttitor massa id. Elementum facilisis leo vel fringilla est ullamcorper eget nulla. Orci porta non pulvinar neque laoreet suspendisse interdum. Purus semper eget duis at tellus at urna. Diam maecenas ultricies mi eget mauris. Diam ut venenatis tellus in metus vulputate eu. Ullamcorper morbi tincidunt ornare massa eget egestas. Quis eleifend quam adipiscing vitae proin. Consectetur adipiscing elit pellentesque habitant. Cras fermentum odio eu feugiat pretium nibh ipsum consequat nisl. Lectus mauris ultrices eros in cursus turpis massa. Luctus accumsan tortor posuere ac. Porttitor eget dolor morbi non arcu. Maecenas pharetra convallis posuere morbi leo urna molestie. Neque convallis a cras semper auctor neque vitae. In iaculis nunc sed augue. Suspendisse interdum consectetur libero id faucibus. Sit amet porttitor eget dolor.

Felis eget nunc lobortis mattis aliquam faucibus. At elementum eu facilisis sed odio. Eu facilisis sed odio morbi quis commodo odio aenean sed. Habitasse platea dictumst quisque sagittis purus sit amet. Et ultrices neque ornare aenean euismod elementum nisi quis eleifend. Velit dignissim sodales ut eu sem integer. Morbi tempus iaculis urna id volutpat lacus laoreet non curabitur. Aliquam eleifend mi in nulla posuere sollicitudin aliquam. Nunc congue nisi vitae suscipit. Convallis tellus id interdum velit laoreet id. Turpis in eu mi bibendum neque egestas. Magna fermentum iaculis eu non diam phasellus vestibulum. In cursus turpis massa tincidunt dui ut ornare lectus sit.

Non pulvinar neque laoreet suspendisse. Eros donec ac odio tempor orci. Nullam non nisi est sit amet facilisis magna etiam tempor. Platea dictumst vestibulum rhoncus est pellentesque elit ullamcorper. Eleifend donec pretium vulputate sapien nec sagittis aliquam. Proin fermentum leo vel orci porta. Eget dolor morbi non arcu risus quis varius quam quisque. Nec ultrices dui sapien eget mi proin sed. Nisl nisi scelerisque eu ultrices vitae auctor eu augue. Pellentesque pulvinar pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et. Pulvinar elementum integer enim neque volutpat ac. Vel orci porta non pulvinar neque. Laoreet sit amet cursus sit amet.

Pharetra massa massa ultricies mi quis hendrerit dolor magna. Mattis nunc sed blandit libero volutpat. Nec ultrices dui sapien eget. Gravida neque convallis a cras semper auctor neque. Aenean et tortor at risus viverra adipiscing at. Quisque non tellus orci ac auctor augue mauris. Ultrices in iaculis nunc sed augue lacus. Quam elementum pulvinar etiam non. Felis bibendum ut tristique et egestas. Sagittis nisl rhoncus mattis rhoncus. Ac ut consequat semper viverra. Volutpat commodo sed egestas egestas fringilla phasellus faucibus scelerisque. Urna condimentum mattis pellentesque id nibh tortor. Erat nam at lectus urna duis convallis convallis. Malesuada fames ac turpis egestas sed tempus urna et pharetra. Pellentesque diam volutpat commodo sed egestas egestas. Interdum velit euismod in pellentesque massa placerat duis ultricies lacus. Est velit egestas dui id. Pellentesque id nibh tortor id aliquet lectus proin nibh. Id nibh tortor id aliquet lectus proin nibh nisl.

Consequat semper viverra nam libero justo laoreet sit. Ornare massa eget egestas purus viverra accumsan in. Dignissim diam quis enim lobortis scelerisque fermentum dui faucibus in. Curabitur gravida arcu ac tortor dignissim convallis aenean et tortor. Erat nam at lectus urna duis convallis convallis tellus. Risus at ultrices mi tempus imperdiet nulla malesuada pellentesque elit. Turpis egestas maecenas pharetra convallis posuere morbi leo. Nulla facilisi etiam dignissim diam quis enim lobortis. Pellentesque massa placerat duis ultricies. Est ante in nibh mauris cursus. Massa sed elementum tempus egestas sed sed risus. Augue ut lectus arcu bibendum at varius. Neque viverra justo nec ultrices dui sapien eget mi proin. Non diam phasellus vestibulum lorem sed risus ultricies. Venenatis cras sed felis eget velit aliquet sagittis id consectetur. Tristique et egestas quis ipsum suspendisse. Facilisis volutpat est velit egestas dui. Non nisi est sit amet facilisis magna. Scelerisque mauris pellentesque pulvinar pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus. Bibendum at varius vel pharetra vel turpis nunc.

Data Analysis:

 The following data comes from the Environmental Justice Screening. It is a 2023 data report on the city of Camden, reporting on pollution and sources, and socioeconomic indicators.  I plan to use this information to explain the social issues that impact local residents of Camden, New Jersey. With a big focus on the Camden Incinerator, it’s been a controversy since the very start of its existence. The people of Camden have never been on board with having a garbage incinerator so close to their home; they have known about the incinerator’s environmental hazards. They tried to address the issue with their local government, but the city has other priorities- it does not include shutting down the incinerator.

 I selected the whole city of Camden as my boundary because I believe that whatever happens in certain neighborhoods will impact the whole city. In this case, the toxic air pollutants from the South Camden Incinerator being exposed to the rest of the city, potentially increasing the health risks of all its citizens. I didn’t increase the buffer radius because I’m only focusing on the city of Camden. The data information shows all the toxins being released in Camden affecting the citizens. It gives a better understanding of how much of these toxins are being released into the air, and the data should be used to get the city government’s attention.

From the pollution and sources section, the most important things for me were the particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, and toxic releases to air. According to the data, the Particulate Matter in Camden scored a 72 percentile in State which is very high. These particles are made up of different chemicals. They’re very harmful to the environment, if a person inhales it, it can cause health problems. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, particles are as small as 2.5 micrometers similar to a single hair on a person’s head. The EPA mentions that any particulate matter less than 10 micrometers can get into your lungs and bloodstream. These particles are practically invisible, and no one would be able to detect them. The human respiratory system is fragile and if the particulate matter reaches the lungs, it’s only a matter of time before lung problems such as asthma, bronchitis, or lung cancer affect individuals. Many citizens in the past have already been diagnosed with asthma. Particulate matter has been a major problem for citizens in the past 30+ years, citizens want change in regards to pollution regulations. 

Toxins such as nitrogen dioxide are found in the South Camden incinerator. If waste is not used for energy, emissions such as nitrogen dioxide are released into the air through the incinerator’s smokestack. Nitrogen dioxide also affects the respiratory system. According to the EPA, breathing air with a high concentration of Nitrogen Dioxide can irritate airways in the lungs. Many Camden citizens are demanding clean air, they want to reduce the amount of emissions being released from the South Camden Incinerator. They don’t want to struggle breathing anymore, they just want to be able to live a normal life. According to the data, the nitrogen dioxide in Camden was valued at 9.1 much higher than the USA average, which is 7.8. 

And on top of that, other variables such as Toxic Releases to Air, Camden’s value was at 2,600. The state average was only 1,100. This indicates that pollution in Camden is no joke, and that the incinerator may have something to do with it. 

Looking at the data from the EJScreen’s “Socioeconomic Indicators”, I was able to determine that Camden is a low income minority city. Things that make up the area are poverty, low income and non-english speakers. 96% of the population in Camden speak Spanish, there’s a chance that there is a language barrier creating miscommunication and isolation from the rest of society. The Spanish speaking population may not have a clue as to what’s going on in their city, things such as toxic air pollution.

Looking at the data, I was able to see that Camden’s population is 53% Hispanic and 40% Black, these are racial groups that have suffered racial inequality. Historically, they’ve had less opportunities to advance in society such as job positions, education, health, etc. This gives me the idea that  the residents of Camden are suffering environmental racism. They have been exposed to toxins from the South Camden Incinerator, and the city government has not fully addressed the root of the problem. But there’s another group involved which is the company that runs the South Camden Incinerator, they have stepped over the EPA’s emission guidelines. 

Going back to the city government, I’m sure they’ve had issues with funding. 31% of their population had less than a high school education, which is much higher than the 9 % state average. When you provide a good education, you ensure a better future for its residents. The data does not show the quality of the schools, but it is obvious the city needs to improve opportunities for education. Funding may be the root of all its problems in Camden. Economically speaking, we know that Camden is receiving its money from the South Camden Incinerator, it’s a big money maker.
Although, Camden’s economy may be doing good. According to the data, the majority of the population is low income at 60%. Low income communities tend to be exposed to poor environmental conditions. Also, Camden’s unemployment is at 15% while the state is 6%. Local government plays a big role in shaping the lives of their residents. The data shows that low income rates are much higher in Camden than other parts of New Jersey and the US. This indicates that poverty is a big problem in Camden. This gives me the idea that most people living in this area can’t afford to live anywhere else but Camden. And that they have no choice but to live somewhere that’s close to hazardous waste. The city would rather put their time and effort into the economy, rather than the people. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection considers Camden an overburdened community. All of this correlates with the Incinerator being put in Camden, a community that is working class citizens with limited opportunities. 

Both the demographic and environmental data, shows the negative impacts that Camden residents have to live with. By looking at the data, we can simply agree that the city government needs to address the pollution problem. The residents of Camden have tried to address the environmental and health issues the incinerator has brought to their home, but have been ignored from the start.

There’s a need for change in Camden. The people have been ignored for a long time. And yet I feel it is important to raise awareness about the situation, to let the unheard voices be heard. My research topic is about a group of people wanting to make a difference in their community. Regardless of race, income or background- we all deserve to breathe fresh air. 

 

Oral Interviews:

Video Story: